- Teacher: Lihle Gumbi
- Teacher: Thekiso Molokwane
- Teacher: Ayabonga Ngidi (218013216)
Learn 2024
Search results: 1517
- Teacher: Andile Clifford Biyela
- Teacher: Syanda Alpheous Mthuli
- Teacher: Thokozani Nzimakwe
- Teacher: Syanda Alpheous Mthuli
Dear Students,
Welcome to this exciting and dynamic core module: Advanced Public Sector Financial Management (PADM8WO) offered in Semester 1 of this year.
The module focuses on all pertinent aspects of government finance in a South African, regional and global context.
I will be taking you through the finer details of the module in classes which commences next week.
Looking forward to your compulsory regular attendance and active participation in the module.
Best wishes
Prof Subban
- Teacher: Mogie Subban
- Teacher: Thembelihle Dlungwane
- Teacher: Nontokozo Brenda Thwala
- Teacher: Tsholofelo Mhlaba
- Teacher: Ilana Moodley
- Teacher: Rajeshree Moodley
- Teacher: Moganavelli Reddy
- Teacher: Shenuka Singh
- Teacher: Nontokozo Brenda Thwala
- Teacher: Mitsuaki Tomita
- Teacher: Jabulani Ncayiyana
- Teacher: Nontokozo Brenda Thwala
- Teacher: Andy Gray
- Teacher: Nelisiwe Khuzwayo
- Teacher: Stephen Eric Knight
- Teacher: Anusha Singh
- Teacher: Nontokozo Brenda Thwala
- Teacher: Julia Clare
- Teacher: Deepak Mistrey
- Teacher: Richard Charlton Sivil
- Teacher: Gregory Huw Morgan Swer
- Teacher: Julia Clare
- Teacher: Lungelo Siphosethu Mbatha
- Teacher: Deepak Mistrey
- Teacher: Richard Charlton Sivil
- Teacher: Gregory Huw Morgan Swer

This section will cover a variety of areas, from how to recognise, analyse, and construct good arguments, to how to critically assess information you’re given. We will learn about common fallacies of reasoning, and how to identify arguments, as well as different types of arguments, and how to evaluate them. You will also learn how to construct strong arguments of your own. Finally, we will look at various arguments from the news and other sources, and learn how to tell whether they are reliable or not.
- Teacher: Sethabile Dlamini (224167605)
- Teacher: Londeka Msani (221012341)
- Teacher: Carin Robinson
- Teacher: Monique Whitaker
- Teacher: Richard Charlton Sivil
- Teacher: Gregory Huw Morgan Swer
- Teacher: Jacek Brzozowski
- Teacher: Azola Dlamini (222078436)
- Teacher: Lihle Mvuzela (222007027)
- Teacher: Monique Whitaker
- Teacher: Julia Clare
- Teacher: Yolanda Hordyk
- Teacher: Lungelo Siphosethu Mbatha
This part of the module introduces the student to moral reasoning about contemporary practical issues. It further encourages thinking about how morality intersects with our political views.
One interesting intersection between morality and practical issues is how civil law is designed to mirror the values of the society it serves but that the values themselves are mostly multifarious and often stand at odds with each other in the same society. In short, moral truth appears to be at least culturally relativised if not subject relative, whereas legal truth presents as objective or absolute. This means it is rationally impossible for the law to reflect moral values.
Students will investigate
meta-ethical arguments about moral realism and anti-realism in order to
understand the philosophical underpinnings of moral relativism. Is moral
relativism true, or are there objective moral facts? The module will then turn
to an introductory discussion of laws around corporal punishment in South
Africa and the empirical basis for having banned all forms of corporal
punishment.
The module asks the student
to consider whether this absolute ruling against corporeal punishment is in
violation of the subjective and cultural mores about child rearing in South
Africa.
- Teacher: Nobuhle Mngadi (221054739)
- Teacher: Luyanda Ndlovu (220060061)
- Teacher: Carin Robinson
- Teacher: Richard Charlton Sivil
- Teacher: Monique Whitaker
- Teacher: Julia Clare
Overview of module content:
Some concepts analysed in philosophical texts are relevant not only to the theories in which they appear, but are also relevant to society itself. One of these is ‘justice’. Since this module exposes students to a study of concepts, issues and debates in social and political philosophy it is perfectly poised to investigate ‘justice’.
In particular, this module
will only focus on socio-economic justice. Different political theories have
distinct concepts of socio-economic justice (from now referred to only as
‘justice’). For instance, liberalism connects justice to individual freedom,
and suggests that all other types of justice are a function of individual
freedom. So, for liberalism, justice is dependent on political structures which
maximise the freedoms and human rights of the individual. But such a conception
of justice, others argue, leads to injustice
in society as it does not account for a range of socio-economic inequalities
which naturally occur in free societies. For these theorists, justice cannot be
tied to individual freedom but should rather be tied to concepts of community,
or communitarianism, or communism.
To this end the student will investigate various academic papers; analysing distinct political philosophies and their conceptions of justice.
Learning outcomes:
By the end of this part of the module the student will be able to:
I. Discuss Marx’s idea of capital, or capitalism, as a source of social dysfunction (which will be interpreted as ‘injustice’ in this module)
II. Discuss Rawl’s concept of justice and fairness, as underpinned by his liberalism
III. Discuss Letseka’s critique of Rawlsian justice as compatible with an Ubuntu conception of justice, even though Ubuntu is a communitarian theory
IV. Discuss Young’s criticism of socio-economic justice as redistribution, and her advocacy of a pluralist, or multifaceted view of justice
- Teacher: Carin Robinson